Breadcrumb

Healthcare Inspection – Mismanagement of Resuscitation and Other Concerns at the Buffalo VA Medical Center, Buffalo, New York

Report Information

Issue Date
Closure Date
Report Number
17-01485-128
VISN
State
New York
District
VA Office
Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Report Author
Office of Healthcare Inspections
Report Type
Hotline Healthcare Inspection
Recommendations
10
Questioned Costs
$0
Better Use of Funds
$0
Congressionally Mandated
No

Summary

Summary
The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted a healthcare inspection to evaluate the circumstances of a patient’s death involving alleged mismanagement of the patient’s resuscitation (Event) at the Buffalo VA Medical Center (Facility), Buffalo, New York, and actions taken by Facility leaders subsequent to the death. The Facility Director contacted the OIG to report a registered nurse (RN 1) found the patient unresponsive and did not “call a code” because he/she feared cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) would traumatize the patient’s body. The OIG substantiated RN 1 did not “call a code” after finding the full-code patient unresponsive. The OIG determined • RN 1 and a respiratory therapist (RT) acted outside their scopes of practice and violated policy when they announced the patient was dead, which influenced others not to take action; • A telemetry RN (RN 2) failed to call for assistance and abandoned the telemetry desk during the Event; • A licensed practical nurse failed to call for assistance and initiate CPR; • Telemetry monitoring failures contributed to the delayed response to the Event; • RN 1 failed to document the patient’s lung assessment and the RT failed to assess the patient’s respiratory status, before and after a scheduled respiratory treatment; and • The Facility’s Performance Manager’s conversation with the patient’s family could have been misunderstood. The OIG identified administrative concerns related to Facility leaders’ responses to the Event. Specifically, Facility leaders did not immediately remove involved staff from direct patient care, conduct a timely Administrative Investigation Board and Root Cause Analysis, submit an Issue Brief to the Veterans Integrated Service Network, and pursue notifying the patient’s family or personal representative. The OIG found Facility staff failed to preserve the patient’s telemetry data. The Facility did not have a policy and Veterans Health Administration has not provided guidance about preservation of evidence after an adverse event. The OIG made 10 recommendations.

Open Recommendation Image, SquareOpenClosed and Implemented Recommendation Image, CheckmarkClosed-ImplementedNot Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'Closed-Not Implemented
No. 1
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to General Counsel (OGC)
Closure Date: 9/16/2019
We recommended that the VA Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to VA Directive 6311, work in conjunction with the Office of Information Technology, Veterans Health Administration offices, and other interested offices to advise the Under Secretary for Health regarding the refinement (or development) of policies reasonably designed to ensure the preservation of electronically stored information when legally necessary (or desirable for purposes of quality improvement), including, but not limited to electronically stored information that is subject to auto-deletion, such as telemetry data.
No. 2
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Closure Date: 11/2/2018
We recommended that the Veterans Integrated Service Network Director conduct an evaluation of the Facility’s quality management practices (including but not limited to Root Cause Analyses, Issue Briefs, Administrative Investigation Boards, and Institutional Disclosures) to ensure that they align with Veterans Health Administration policies and also address the following specific deficiencies in this case: (a) the failure to conduct a Root Cause Analysis, (b) the failure to conduct a timely Administrative Investigation Board, (c) the failure to provide an Issue Brief, (d) the failure of the Administrative Investigation Board to consider all available evidence, and (e) the failure to make an Institutional Disclosure consistent with Veterans Health Administration Policy.
No. 3
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Closure Date: 8/9/2018
We recommended that the Facility Director review the care of the patient who is the subject of this report and confer with the Office of Human Resources and the Office of General Counsel to determine the appropriate administrative action to take, if any.
No. 4
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Closure Date: 11/2/2018
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure that staff conduct interprofessional mock code training throughout the Facility with debriefing and monitor outcomes.
No. 5
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Closure Date: 11/2/2018
We recommended that the Facility Director conduct an evaluation inclusive of, but not limited to, unit 9B and the Respiratory Department to determine if there are issues undermining teamwork at the work place, take action to address those issues, and monitor compliance.
No. 6
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Closure Date: 11/2/2018
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure that staff adhere to the Facility’s telemetry policy including, but not limited to, saving rhythm strips when a patient has a change in his/her baseline or a significant arrhythmia, that a competent staff member is always at the telemetry station, and that facility managers monitor compliance.
No. 7
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Closure Date: 11/2/2018
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure that the Facility’s Education Department staff review the adequacy of its annual telemetry monitoring re-certification process including, but not limited to, evaluating whether to institute additional requirements for staff who rarely have practical experience in telemetry monitoring and establishing procedures to ensure that re-tests are conducted and tracked appropriately and monitor compliance.
No. 8
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Closure Date: 11/2/2018
We recommended that the Facility Director evaluate the Respiratory Department handoff communications process including the timing of patients’ treatments and code status and modify as appropriate.
No. 9
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Closure Date: 11/2/2018
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure staff assess patients before and after breathing treatments, document the patient’s response in the electronic health record, and monitor compliance.
No. 10
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Closure Date: 3/12/2018
We recommended that the Facility Director review the content of Facility staff’s communication to the patient’s family and take corrective action if it is determined that the communication was insufficient to convey that the Facility was disclosing potentially inadequate care.