Recommendations

2183
555
Open Recommendations
858
Closed in Last Year
Age of Open Recommendations
383
Open Less Than 1 Year
157
Open Between 1-5 Years
15
Open More Than 5 Years
Key
Open Less Than 1 Year
Open Between 1-5 Years
Open More Than 5 Years
Closed
Total Recommendations found,
Total Reports found.
ID Report Number Report Title Type
25-03623-147 Review of Timeliness of Mental Health Community Care Appointments Review

1
Consider the need for adjustments to current or for future contractual requirements that would improve mental health appointment timeliness by third-party administrators.
Closure Date:
2
Identify and disseminate best practices used by healthcare systems to contact veterans, evaluate barriers to broader adoption of those practices, and implement a plan that supports consistent use of those best practices to improve scheduling timeliness.
3
Ensure that systems used to identify available community providers capture the full range of preferences that matter to veterans, so scheduling can better align with their individual needs and expectations for care.
4
Evaluate whether the third-party administrator’s network adequacy standards for mental health providers meet demand for both in person and telehealth, and if needed, modify the language to explicitly require sufficient availability of both in‑person and telehealth mental health providers to meet veteran demand.
5
Conduct a review to determine the best approach for increasing external use of available systems by community providers to streamline communication between the Veterans Health Administration and community providers and develop, implement, and monitor an action plan based on the review’s findings.
6
Assess the need for standardized guidance or contractual requirements that prohibit community mental health providers from requesting additional forms containing information already provided in the Veterans Health Administration referral documentation and implement measures to ensure compliance.
Closure Date:
24-00818-208 Review of VHA Maternity Care Coordination and Women Veterans’ Experience Hotline Healthcare Inspection

1
The Under Secretary for Health reviews Veterans Health Administration’s compliance with requirements for postpartum care coordination contacts by the maternity care coordinator and implements an action plan to ensure sustained compliance.
2
The Under Secretary for Health reviews Veterans Health Administration maternity care coordinators’ compliance with requirements for postpartum screenings and implements an action plan to ensure sustained compliance.
3
The Under Secretary for Health evaluates concerns regarding community care billing and billing resolution processes for maternity care and implements an action plan as warranted.
4
The Under Secretary for Health evaluates the scheduling and completion of postpartum primary care appointments within three months of delivery and implements an action plan to ensure sustained compliance.
25-00250-210 Healthcare Facility Inspection of the VA Wichita Healthcare System in Kansas Healthcare Facility Inspection

1
The Medical Center Director develops service-level workflows for communicating test results.
Closure Date:
2
The Medical Center Director monitors data on the communication of test results to providers and patients as required by VHA Directive 1088(1), Communicating Test Results to Providers and Patients.
25-04102-182 Review of Facility Leaders’ Oversight of Care Coordination Services within Homeless Programs at the VA Portland Health Care System in Oregon Hotline Healthcare Inspection

1
The VA Portland Health Care System Director ensures the Community Reintegration Services director and Health Care for Homeless Veterans program coordinator establish a process to monitor and verify case managers comply with monthly veteran contacts as required by the facility’s HCHV Case Management Workflow Guide, and takes action as warranted.
2
The VA Portland Health Care System Director ensures Health Care for Homeless Veterans staff discharge veterans from the Health Care for Homeless Veterans program in accordance with the facility’s HCHV Case Management Workflow Guide.
3
The VA Portland Health Care System Director reviews the quality management evaluations, once completed, for Veteran A’s and Veteran B’s care, and takes action as warranted.
Closure Date:
4
The VA Portland Health Care System Director evaluates the Community Reintegration Services reporting structure and resources to determine if the current structure allows for effective oversight of essential homeless programs, and makes modifications if needed.
Closure Date:
5
The VA Portland Health Care System Director ensures the Community Reintegration Services director monitors and verifies Grant and Per Diem liaisons’ compliance with Veterans Health Administration Directive 1162.01 requirements related to conducting veteran contacts.
25-02645-131 Review of Assignment of Noncompensable Musculoskeletal Joint Disabilities Review

1
Consult with the VA Office of General Counsel to establish a clear and consistent interpretation of 38 C.F.R. § 4.59, to include clarification of whether pain alone without painful motion is sufficient to warrant a compensable evaluation.
2
Based on the clarified interpretation of 38 C.F.R. § 4.59, consider revising the Adjudication Procedures Manual to improve consistency of terms, and notify claims processors of the revision.
3
Assess whether guidance is clear to claims processors regarding the requirement to review all evidence, including both objective and subjective evidence, as well as the proper weight that should be given to each piece of evidence.
4
Determine what actions are necessary to the evaluation builder tool to mitigate confusion and ensure decision consistency for all musculoskeletal joint conditions.
Total Monetary Impact of All Recommendations
Open: $44,979,787
Closed: $0
Total: $44,979,787
24-03541-173 Review of VHA’s Screening and Evaluation of Traumatic Brain Injury in Post-9/11 Veterans Hotline Healthcare Inspection

1
The Under Secretary for Health reviews the comprehensive traumatic brain injury evaluation referral process for veterans with positive traumatic brain injury screens and ensures veterans interested in further evaluation are referred for a comprehensive traumatic brain injury evaluation.
2
The Under Secretary for Health considers the development of a uniform referral method for the utilization of Polytrauma System of Care resources.
3
The Under Secretary for Health reviews the one-time use limitation of the comprehensive traumatic brain injury evaluation template to allow documentation of additional evaluations whenever a veteran screens positive for deployment-related traumatic brain injury after a subsequent separation.
25-03881-160 Review of Radiology Staffing and Services at the VA Washington DC Healthcare System Hotline Healthcare Inspection

1
The Under Secretary for Health ensures the Veterans Health Administration continues plans toward a sustainable workforce model, enterprise-wide image-sharing capabilities, and standardization of clinical workflows and workload distribution.
2
The Under Secretary for Health ensures that leaders at Veterans Health Administration facilities experiencing interruptions in radiology services (1) conduct comprehensive, proactive assessments of the clinical impact to patients awaiting completion of radiology studies; and (2) report any incidents of harm or potential harm from incomplete radiologic studies to facility quality management leaders for local tracking to reduce patient safety risks.
3
The VA Washington DC Healthcare System Director ensures that any incidents of harm or potential harm from incomplete radiologic studies are reported to facility quality management leaders for local tracking to reduce patient safety risks.
25-01698-70 Federal Information Security Modernization Act Audit for Fiscal Year 2025 Audit

1
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology consistently implement an improved continuous monitoring program in accordance with the NIST Risk Management Framework. Specifically, regarding the independent evaluation of the effectiveness of security controls prior to granting authorization decisions. 
2
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology implement improved processes for reviewing and updating key security documentation, including Security Control Assessments and Privacy Impact Assessments as needed. Such updates will ensure all required information is included and accurately reflects the current environment, new security risks, and applicable Federal standards.
3
We recommended the VA Office of Personnel Security, Human Resources, and Contract Offices strengthen processes to ensure appropriate levels of background investigations are performed timely and completed for applicable VA employees and contractors. 
4
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology ensure contingency plans for all systems and applications are updated and tested in accordance with VA requirements.
5
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology implement improved procedures to ensure that system outages are resolved within stated recovery time objectives. 
6
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology ensure backups are conducted periodically and tested in accordance with established standards for VA system and application data. 
7
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology ensure system owners consistently implement processes for periodic reviews of user account access and maintain access authorization documentation. Remove unnecessary and inactive accounts on systems and networks. 
8
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology ensure system owners consistently follow termination procedures for the timely disablement of user accounts and the proper completion of termination checklists for separated personnel.
9
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology work with system owners and change implementers to improve adherence to standards and best practices across the Systems Development Lifecycle (SDLC) for testing and approval of system changes for VA systems and networks. 
10
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology work with system owners and application teams to implement and enforce standards for processes related to preventing and detecting potential unauthorized changes across all platforms and applications in the environment.
11
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology ensure that all systems and platforms are monitored for compliance with documented VA standards for baseline configurations. Ensure that system owners consistently implement and monitor their configurations. 
12
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology implement automated software management processes on all agency platforms to identify and prevent the use of unauthorized software on agency devices.
13
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology work with system owners to ensure adherence to established procedures for maintaining, documenting, and monitoring an accurate software and logical hardware inventory for system boundaries across the enterprise.
14
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology implement improved processes for monitoring and analyzing significant system audit events for unauthorized or unusual activities across all systems and platforms in accordance with VA policy. 
15
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology enable system audit logs on all critical systems and platforms and conduct centralized reviews of security violations across the enterprise.
16
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology implement improved mechanisms to continuously identify and remediate security deficiencies on VA’s network infrastructure, database platforms, and Web application servers in accordance with established policy timeframes. If patches cannot be applied or are unavailable, other protections or mitigations should be documented and implemented to address the specific risks.
17
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology continue to implement controls that restrict vulnerable medical devices from unnecessary access from the general network. 
18
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology implement improved processes to require system owners and management to provide adequate credentials to ensure security scans are authenticated to end devices where feasible and the subsequent vulnerabilities are remediated in a timely manner.
19
We recommended the Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology improve the process for tracking and resolving vulnerabilities that cannot be addressed by enterprise processes within policy timeframes. Implement mitigations for identified security deficiencies by applying security patches, system software updates, or configuration changes to reduce applicable security risks. Additionally, VA should enhance their process for updating baseline images to ensure aged vulnerabilities are not introduced into the environment. 
25-01584-123 Audit of the Education Service’s Compliance Surveys Audit

1
Update the appropriate manual to ensure all statutorily required VA educational benefit programs are included in active student counts.
Closure Date:
2
Ensure contractor performance is measured in accordance with the contract and that a quality assurance surveillance plan is developed for future contracts for compliance surveys with clear roles and responsibilities of Veterans Benefits Administration staff and with measurable, documented surveillance procedures and outcomes.
3
Develop, document, and implement procedures for identifying, waiving, and assigning compliance survey workload to ensure all education and training institutions are scheduled and surveyed as required, and update the Veterans Benefits Administration Manual 22‑4 as necessary.
Closure Date:
4
Evaluate the effectiveness of quality control activities for Veterans Benefits Administration and contracted compliance survey specialists and implement improved or additional controls where needed.
5
Ensure continued focus on collaboration and communication between Approvals, Compliance, and Liaison regions and evaluate the organization’s regional structure to ensure compliance surveys are consistently and effectively scheduled and assigned.
Closure Date:
6
Ensure Approvals, Compliance, and Liaison leaders develop and continue to implement policy and procedures for using waivers for compliance surveys and develop metrics to evaluate record of compliance criteria so waivers maintain the intent of the statute.
Closure Date:
Total Monetary Impact of All Recommendations
Open: $19,386,671
Closed: $0
Total: $19,386,671
25-02440-122 Review of the Fiduciary Program’s Misuse Allegation Process Review

1
Review and update applicable sections of the VA Fiduciary Program Manual to clarify how to properly evaluate an allegation, including detailing what constitutes a misuse allegation that must be documented and reviewed, and when an investigation is needed, in coordination with the VA Office of General Counsel if necessary.
2
Clarify in the VA Fiduciary Program Manual how potential misuses of beneficiary funds, such as red flag indicators, must be addressed and documented, and reinforce with training or resources as needed.
3
Clearly communicate the evidentiary standard staff should use in the allegation phase to help ensure application of different standards is accurate and easily understood and results in consistent compliance with how investigations are initiated, and consider consulting with the VA Office of General Counsel if necessary.
4
Develop a plan to implement or enhance the national quality review program to ensure compliance with procedural guidance for processing all phases of misuse allegations.
Closure Date:
15591