Vet Center Inspection of Midwest District 3 Zone 3 and Selected Vet Centers
Report Information
Summary
The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) Vet Center Inspection Program provides a focused evaluation of aspects of care delivered at vet centers. This report focused on Midwest district 3 zone 3 and four selected vet centers: Columbia, Missouri; Fargo, North Dakota; Omaha, Nebraska; and Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The OIG inspection focused on five review areas: leadership and organizational risks; quality reviews; suicide prevention; consultation, supervision, and training; and environment of care. Generally, district leaders had a good understanding of quality improvement and implemented quality improvement programs in response to VA All Employee Survey results. District 3 zone 3 Vet Center Service Customer Feedback survey results exceeded national scores. The OIG issued one recommendation to the District Director related to annual training. The OIG closed the recommendation because overdue trainings were completed and future trainings were scheduled. The OIG conducted an analysis of vet center quality reviews required to ensure compliance with policy and procedures. The OIG made two recommendations to the District Director for clinical and administrative quality reviews. The OIG made two recommendations specific to morbidity and mortality reviews: one recommendation to the District Director and one to the Readjustment Counseling Service Chief Officer (RCS). The suicide prevention review included zone-wide evaluation of electronic client records, and a focused review of the four selected vet centers. The OIG issued seven recommendations—six specific to electronic client records and one for selected vet centers’ suicide prevention and intervention processes. The consultation, supervision, and training review evaluated the four selected vet centers. The OIG identified concerns with external clinical consultation, supervision, audits, and training, and issued four recommendations. The environment of care review evaluated the four selected vet centers. The OIG made two recommendations.



The District Director determines reasons clinical quality review remediation plans did not include documentation of deficiency resolution and the time frame for resolution for the Fargo, Omaha, and Sioux Falls Vet Centers, takes indicated actions to ensure completion, and monitors compliance.
The Readjustment Counseling Service Chief Officer defines “serious suicide attempt” and establishes criteria for when a morbidity and mortality review is required as well as a standardized process for completing the review.
The District Director ensures the intake portion of the psychosocial assessment is completed and monitors compliance across all zone vet centers.
The District Director ensures suicide risk assessments are completed on the first clinical visit and monitors compliance across all zone vet centers.
The District Director ensures clinical staff consult and coordinate care with the support VA medical facility for shared clients flagged as high risk for suicide and monitors compliance across all zone vet centers.
The District Director verifies clinical staff follow confidentiality requirements when consulting and coordinating care with the support VA medical facility for shared clients at high risk for suicide and monitors compliance across all zone vet centers.
The District Director ensures clinical staff complete safety plans for clients that are assessed at intermediate or high, acute or chronic, risk level as required and monitors compliance across all zone vet centers.
The District Director ensures clinical staff consult with the vet center director, external clinical consultant, associate district director for counseling, or support VA medical facility mental health provider to include the suicide prevention coordinator following a client’s suicide risk assessment as required, and monitors compliance across all zone vet centers.