Breadcrumb

Alleged Improper Locality Pay for Teleworking Employee

Report Information

Issue Date
Closure Date
Report Number
18-03251-88
VISN
State
District
VA Office
General Counsel (OGC)
Report Author
Office of Special Reviews
Report Type
Administrative Investigation
Major Management Challenges
Leadership and Governance
Recommendations
1
Questioned Costs
$0
Better Use of Funds
$0
Congressionally Mandated
No

Summary

Summary

The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) investigated an allegation that an employee in the VA Office of General Counsel’s District Contracting National Practice Group was approved to move his/her office from Pittsburgh to Altoona, Pennsylvania, but continued to improperly receive the higher locality pay for the Pittsburgh area. The OIG substantiated that the employee’s telework agreement did not comply with applicable regulations, which require an employee to report to his or her official worksite twice per pay period when the employee is not in a permanent telework arrangement. In this instance, the employee’s official worksite was Pittsburgh and the employee’s supervisor had approved an exception to accommodate the employee’s caregiving needs for a family member. This approval occurred in 2008, and the telework arrangement remained in effect through at least November 2017. Although exceptions can be granted on a temporary basis, there is no discretion to grant a permanent exception to the requirement that a teleworking employee report to his or her official worksite twice per pay period. There was no evidence that the employee’s supervisors ever reassessed the telework arrangement to determine whether it continued to be appropriate. The OIG determined that the employee and the employee’s supervisors took appropriate corrective action once the issue became known in November 2017, prior to the initiation of the OIG’s investigation. The OIG did not identify any evidence to suggest that the failure to reassess the employee’s telework circumstances was the result of an intentional effort to improperly impact the employee’s locality pay. Accordingly, the OIG did not substantiate misconduct. The OIG makes one recommendation relating to the need to clarify the authority and obligations of telework-approving supervisors within the Office of General Counsel.

Open Recommendation Image, SquareOpenClosed and Implemented Recommendation Image, CheckmarkClosed-ImplementedNot Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'Closed-Not Implemented
No. 1
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to General Counsel (OGC)
Closure Date: 2/18/2020
The Office of General Counsel communicates to its telework-approving supervisors that they lack authority to grant permanent exceptions to the twice-per-pay-period reporting requirement of 5 C.F.R. § 531.605(d)(1), and that in any instance in which an exception is granted pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 531.605(d)(2) or any other applicable provision, the supervisor is obligated to periodically reassess the employee’s telework arrangement to determine whether a permanent change of official worksite is necessary.