Breadcrumb

Deficiencies in Crisis Management of a Client, Crisis Reporting, and Documentation Practices at the Everett Vet Center in Washington

Report Information

Issue Date
Report Number
24-02690-167
VISN
State
Washington
District
Pacific
VA Office
Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Report Author
Office of Healthcare Inspections
Report Type
Hotline Healthcare Inspection
Report Topic
Mental Health
Suicide Prevention
Major Management Challenges
Healthcare Services
Leadership and Governance
Recommendations
9
Questioned Costs
$0
Better Use of Funds
$0
Congressionally Mandated
No

Summary

Summary

The OIG evaluated allegations related to (1) the crisis management of a client at the Everett Vet Center; (2) documentation added to the client’s clinical record by district 5, zone 1 (district) and Everett Vet Center leaders to justify lack of action; and (3) altered notes. The OIG reviewed concerns regarding clinical documentation, safety planning, and the Vet Center Director’s (VCD’s) clinical consultation to staff.

The OIG substantiated that Everett Vet Center staff and leaders inadequately managed the client’s crisis because the VCD advised a counselor to allow the client to leave the clinic without notifying law enforcement authorities. The OIG also substantiated that the VCD and counselor failed to seek consultation from the support facility’s external consultant or follow up with the support facility’s suicide prevention team. The counselor did not update the client’s safety plan when the client presented to the appointment with increased risk.

The OIG found that the VCD backdated a progress note due to lack of awareness of documentation requirements and a district leader deleted progress notes; however, at the time, staff and leaders had the capability to delete notes and did so under certain circumstances. The counselor delayed crisis reporting due to uncertainty about whether the client’s circumstances met the criteria for reporting the event. 

The OIG found that conflicting information regarding the scope of the VCD’s clinical responsibilities may have contributed to the VCD’s failure to consult immediately with a district leader on the day of the client’s visit.

The OIG made four Readjustment Counseling Service-level recommendations on crisis reporting and monitoring, clinical record and risk assessment documentation, and VCD position descriptions; and five district-level recommendations related to  reviews of care; duty-to-warn obligations; consultation with external consultants and suicide prevention coordinators; and safety planning.
 

Open Recommendation Image, SquareOpenClosed and Implemented Recommendation Image, CheckmarkClosed-ImplementedNot Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'Closed-Not Implemented
No. 1
Open Recommendation Image, Square
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)

The District 5 Director conducts a full review of care provided to the client by the Everett Vet Center Director and counselor, consults with Human Resources and General Counsel Offices, and takes action as needed.

No. 2
Open Recommendation Image, Square
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)

The District 5 Director ensures vet center leaders and staff are knowledgeable about applicable state laws pertaining to duty to warn.

No. 3
Open Recommendation Image, Square
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)

The District 5 Director makes certain that the Everett Vet Center Director and staff adhere to requirements for consultation with support facility external consultants and suicide prevention coordinators when indicated, and monitors compliance.

No. 4
Open Recommendation Image, Square
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)

The Chief Officer, Readjustment Counseling Service provides written guidance to clarify crisis reporting criteria and monitoring responsibilities.

No. 5
Open Recommendation Image, Square
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)

The Chief Officer, Readjustment Counseling Service establishes written policy that clarifies clinical record documentation requirements regarding entry dates; non-visit progress note completion time frames; and progress note deletion and addition, and monitors compliance.

No. 6
Open Recommendation Image, Square
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)

The Chief Officer, Readjustment Counseling Service establishes written guidance regarding time requirements for the completion of risk assessment documentation in clients’ clinical records.

No. 7
Open Recommendation Image, Square
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)

The District 5 Director ensures readjustment counselors’ compliance with updating and reviewing safety plans as required by Readjustment Counseling Service policy.

No. 8
Open Recommendation Image, Square
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)

The Chief Officer, Readjustment Counseling Service ensures that vet center directors are issued the correct position description and are performing duties within the identified scope of work.

No. 9
Open Recommendation Image, Square
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)

The District 5 Director conducts a review of the care provided to complex clients by the Everett Vet Center Director since March 2021 and addresses identified clinical needs.